Find the loose threads. Keep the story yours.

Continuity review can consider what appears in the manuscript alongside relevant characters, places, lore, relationships and timeline information. That context helps a possible contradiction point back to the facts that produced it.

Findings are meant to be inspected against the actual draft. A suggestion is not proof that the story is wrong.

• Continuity findings and contradiction checks
• Story intelligence across manuscript and world information
• Evidence references and uncertainty where the signal is incomplete

When a review identifies a possible new or changed canon fact, Plotilla can present a canon proposal for you to consider. Proposals are not silent database edits.

You review, accept or dismiss them. The manuscript and established world remain unchanged unless you choose to make the change.

Fiction often contains intentional mysteries, unreliable narration and changes that are justified later. The review should help you investigate those cases, not flatten them into automatic errors.

Plotilla cannot guarantee that a story has no plot holes or contradictions. It is a review aid for authors who want another careful pass over connected evidence.

Use a chapter review for a focused pass or Story Intelligence for broader project relationships. Keep the findings that help, dismiss the ones that do not, and return to the manuscript when the evidence calls for a revision.